Guide
Best AI Model for Research & Analysis
Deep research, literature reviews, data synthesis, and complex analysis. Find models that think deeply and handle long documents.
Top Recommended Models
1
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic · frontier
95/100
Reasoning9.5/10
Long Context9.5/10
Factuality9.5/10
Coding10/10
Creativity9/10
$5/1M in$25/1M out1000K context
Long codebase analysis with 1M beta context windowHigh-stakes document analysis where accuracy is criticalConstitutional AI research and alignment-sensitive applicationsThe most expensive frontier model at $5/$25 per million tokens
2
GPT-5.4
OpenAI · frontier
94/100
Reasoning9.5/10
Long Context9.5/10
Factuality9.5/10
Coding9.5/10
Creativity9/10
$2.5/1M in$15/1M out1000K context
Multimodal analysis combining text, images, audio, and video in a single turnResearch and analysis tasks requiring near-perfect factuality and citationExpensive at scale — 6x the cost of GPT-5.4-mini for marginal quality gains on simpler tasks
3
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google · frontier
92/100
Reasoning9.5/10
Long Context9.5/10
Factuality9/10
Coding9/10
Creativity8/10
$2/1M in$12/1M out1049K context
Multimodal analysis combining video, audio, images, and textResearch and analysis tasks where self-verification improves accuracyPreview model — API may change, behavior may shift between versions
4
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic · frontier
90/100
Reasoning9/10
Long Context9/10
Factuality9/10
Coding9.5/10
Creativity8.5/10
$3/1M in$15/1M out1000K context
Complex document analysis and structured extraction over long contextsGap vs Opus is visible on the hardest SWE-bench problems and complex refactors
5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google · frontier
90/100
Reasoning9/10
Long Context10/10
Factuality9/10
Coding8.5/10
Creativity7.5/10
$1.25/1M in$10/1M out1049K context
STEM research requiring thinking-mode reasoning with groundingMulti-document synthesis and comparison across hundreds of sourcesData analysis with native code execution for verificationThinking mode increases latency significantly (5-20s for complex queries)
Pricing Comparison
| Model | Input $/1M | Output $/1M | Context | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.6 | $5 | $25 | 1000K | 95 |
| GPT-5.4 | $2.5 | $15 | 1000K | 94 |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | $2 | $12 | 1049K | 92 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | $3 | $15 | 1000K | 90 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | $1.25 | $10 | 1049K | 90 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Try it yourself
Describe your research & analysis task and get a personalized model recommendation in seconds.